What are the criteria for each submission stage?

A submission passes through various stages as part of the editorial process. These are:

  • Unassigned: has not yet had an editor/section editor assigned to it to start the review process
  • Ready for peer review: has had an editor/section editor assigned to it, but the review process has not yet begun (i.e. peer reviewers have not been invited)
  • Reviewers invited: the minimum number of peer reviewers (default is 2) have been invited to the review the submission, but have not yet accepted the task
  • Reviews outstanding: the minimum number of reviewers have accepted the invitation to review the submission, but have not yet sent back their review feedback and completed the task
  • Reviews complete: all reviewers have completed their task and submitted their peer review feedback but an editorial decision has not yet been made
  • Awaiting revision: the editor has asked the author to make revisions to their submission and is currently waiting for the revised file to be submitted
  • Revisions submitted: the author has submitted their revised file, but the editor has not yet made a subsequent editorial decision (resubmit for review, accept, reject etc)

If the editor chooses to send the submission back for further revisions or for a subsequent round of peer review then the above stages will be re-activated, as appropriate. If the submission is accepted, it will pass into the 'Editing' page, and if the submission is rejected is will pass to the 'Archives' page.

Did this answer your question? Thanks for the feedback There was a problem submitting your feedback. Please try again later.